Earlier this month, a San Diego judged issued a preliminary injunction blocking a contract approved by the 22nd District Agricultural Association for Ray Cammack Shows to operate the rides at the San Diego County Fair this year, which is set to open in June. The fair attracts thousands of visitors a year. A Ferris wheel is seen here in 2017. / Photo by Andrea Lopez-Villafaña

Headlines for weeks have jarred San Diegans with the news that the annual County Fair may not go on this year because the agency charged with overseeing the Del Mar Fairgrounds is wrapped up in a lawsuit.

A judge concluded earlier this month that the 22nd District Agricultural Association likely rigged a contract it approved in January. Behind that decision, though, is a description of severe misconduct.

Del Mar Fairgrounds CEO Carlene Moore has been accused of rigging the contract in question. Yet she still holds her position and has not faced any disciplinary action by the 22nd District board or the state.

San Diego Judge Kenneth Medel issued a preliminary injunction earlier this month ruling that the 22nd District, a state government entity that operates the Fairgrounds, likely manipulated the contract process that gave carnival operator Ray Cammack Shows the exclusive rights to run the rides and games at the fair, citing indications of “fraud,” “favoritism” and “corruption.” 

Moore has not faced discipline for the role she played in allegedly rigging the contract, and the state agencies that are supposed to oversee the District have given no indication they plan to hold it accountable.

The 22nd District operates the Del Mar Fairgrounds on behalf of the state of California. The governor appoints its board members.

The Department of General Services, the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Governor’s office all have some oversight capacity over the agency, and are all aware of the situation, but seem to be passing it off to one another.

The District is the subject of an ongoing lawsuit brought forward by Talley Amusements, another carnival operator that sued the District over the awarding of the current contract to Ray Cammack Shows and a previous contract last year.

Talley alleges the District changed the scores during the 2021 bid selection process to ensure that Ray Cammack Shows would win the contract. Days after Talley formally protested the bid, the District canceled the Request for Proposals altogether.

Months later, the District released a new request for proposals for the next year’s fair, only this time, it included stricter requirements that were not in the previous bid, which effectively excluded Talley Amusements because it did not meet the new requirements.

Talley argued that Ray Cammack Shows was the only bidder in the country that could meet some of the new requirements.

In January, two former employees of the Fairgrounds, former contracts manager Michael Ceragioli and former contracts analyst Jean Fluornoy, both testified in separate depositions that Talley had actually won the bid in 2021, not Ray Cammack Shows, but Moore had the score sheet changed to ensure that Ray Cammack Shows was the winner.

In his ruling, Medel stated that Moore never directly denied claims the scores were changed or that she influenced her colleague to change the scores. He said the evidence indicates the scores were changed and that the District had rigged the qualifications to favor Ray Cammack Shows.

During this entire process, the District board has avoided taking any sort of disciplinary action toward Moore; she remains in her seat as the Fairground’s CEO. There also has not been any indication of an internal investigation by the board or the state.

“It is hard to understand where the 22nd District is coming from,” said John Moot, the attorney for Talley Amusements. “I mean as a responsible agency, when you have the kind of testimony that the judge cites, in his opinion, you would normally put that CEO on administrative leave and conduct an investigation, and the fact that they didn't do that, in and of itself, is an indication of what's going on at that agency.”

Monica Hassan, deputy director of the Department of General Services, said the Department has some oversight role over the 22nd District, but not a disciplinary role.

The Governor’s office directed Planetcob to the California Department of Food and Agriculture when reached for comment, adding that Department of Food and Agriculture is the “oversight agency for the 22nd District.” Moore was appointed by the District’s board members, who were all appointed directly by the governor.

“CDFA is currently evaluating next steps,” Steve Lyle, director of public affairs for the California Department of Food and Agriculture, said in an email. “In light of the active status of the litigation, we are unable to comment regarding the recent court finding.”

This lawsuit has been ongoing since 2021, yet the state agencies who are supposed to oversee their own entity have not stepped in.

The District refused to comment on whether there are any pending disciplinary actions for Moore or internal investigations.

“We are doing everything we can to preserve a full carnival midway at the Fair,” said Jennifer Hellman, spokeswoman for the 22nd District Agricultural Association, in an email on April 12. “We are continuing discussions with the involved parties about a modified contract and we remain hopeful that we can reach a meaningful and appropriate resolution very soon. However, we cannot simply hand over the contract to the plaintiffs or anyone else in this case — we must follow a process that ensures that whatever solution we come up with is fair and equitable and complies with the law. We will continue to provide updates as they become available.”  

Tigist Layne is Planetcob's north county reporter. Contact her directly at tigist.layne@planetcob.com or (619) 800-8453. Follow her...

Join the Conversation


  1. Glad to see some reporting on this. I've wondered if there were any repercussions for Carlene Moore.

  2. Thank You! I've watched in dismay over the past several months as this has unfolded. I think that Judge Medel's order earlier this month and his refusal to stay the injunction he ordered was the first time the Board had an authority clearly tell them that what happened here was not in line with State procurement laws and rules, and that it was serious enough to halt this contract even with the San Diego County Fair just 2 months away. Up until Judge Medel's very clear court orders this month, the Board was in defense mode, partly as litigation strategy but also likely in hopes of keeping the San Diego County Fair on track, which hasn't been fully held since 2019. But by waiting for an external authority to act, the Board has actually put the Fair in greater jeopardy. At this time, it is not only CEO Moore who needs to be held accountable for her actions, but the Board of Directors of the 22nd DAA. And the Governor appointed them, so the power to do so flows from him.

    1. Please push for these comments and the people's desire for Moore and the Board to be replaced. Also, with two opposing companies now being forced to work together who are entrusted to safe midway rides, how safe will it be??

  3. As this story notes, the people directly in charge are the 22nd Agricultural District board of directors. They are the ones who should be held accountable by the media. How about G. Joyce Rowland, the board president, who is a Sempra vice president in charge of human relations. Or Frederick Schenk, a board vice-president, who is an attorney at CaseyGerry. Or Richard Valdez, also a board vice-president, who is an attorney at Sandler, Lasry, Laube, Byer, and Valdez?

    Yes, these are plumb political appointments and those who appointed the board should also be held accountable, but each of the board members should be contacted to understand why they have acted as they have on behalf of the people of California.


  4. Moore undoubtable doing what her bosses want, dole out contracts as political favors. In the real world she would be fired , if not under indictment but this is Gavins world and the minions will pay the price.
    Who but Newsom could take the priceless crown jewel of Del Mar and run it onto the rocks as if it were the Exxon Valdez. It's time to take the toys away from the politicians and let a grown up run the Fairgrounds.

  5. As I understand, from attorney John Moot, the two parties are indeed working out a joint agreement for the Fair to go on this year. Why Carlene Moore has not be sanctioned is the mystery in this process. She has, essentially, agreed she changed the scoring and then shredded the documents. What other official would get away with that action?

  6. This is not the only corruption Moore is involved in with the Fairgrounds. Job Titles have been changed in order to bring in “yes” people instead of original employees being asked back to their old jobs. A full investigation into current management needs to take place. This is an insult to the historic fairgrounds and the people of San Diego. The Board has done a horrible job in dealing with Moore and her cronies. All of them should be replaced! Look into the Napa Fair that Moore bankrupted a few years'ago. Google it, very messy!

  7. Carlene destroyed the Napa County Fair in Calistoga. Then she left to continue her corruption in San Diego County! She must be hard accountable!

  8. Carlene Moore ran The Napa County Fairgrounds in Calistoga into the ground and it's been shut down ever since. If the County Supervisors had any integrity whatsoever they would have investigated her before she left. Unfortunately they are probably just a crooked as she is.

  9. Follow the Money.
    If you care about your fairgrounds and for it to continue....
    Please, Please, Please
    Do a forensic audit of the fairgrounds accounts and the accounts of the CEO.

  10. As a Calistogan, I can report that none of this is surprising to us. We all were so naive to Carlene’s corruption.

  11. Does anyone know if contract rigging is similar to gerrymandering elections?
    Both seem to have similar results of one person manipulating for their own choice or own benefit.

Leave a comment
We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.